🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries